Quite topical, being the USA's Memorial Day- because this colonization will call far a great many to make the ultimate sacrifice.
Hat Tip: Planck's Constant
Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system. Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called "religious rights."
When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to "the reasonable" Muslim demands for their "religious rights," they also get the other components under the table. Here’s how it works (percentages source CIA: The World Fact Book (2007).
As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:
United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply.
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris — car burnings, etc.). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam — Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
100% will usher in the peace of "Dar-es-Salaam" — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:
Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
Somalia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%
Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.
"Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel". — Leon Uris, "The Haj"
It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.
"Stephen Blackman tried explaining his failure to disclose more than $300,000 in income by claiming he didn't know what the "$" symbol meant.
Sam Ellis, appearing for the Inland Revenue Department, said in a letter dated February 9, 2009, Blackman wrote he had not been paid by his company Plant and Platform Consultants Ltd, of New Plymouth.
"You may have been confused by forms provided to you by my company which contained impressive numbers preceded by a "$" symbol," Blackman wrote..."
You hear some bullshit excuses but that on really takes the biscuit!
If he really is that dumb he should be sectioned.
"The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) says it is OK to call lollies "Eskimos", despite the term making one television viewer uncomfortable.
The ASA received a complaint from J Hemingway about an advertisement for the Pascall Party Mix Bag, which referred to "old favourites" including Eskimos..."
Well thank you very much for letting me use the friggin' name I have used since I learnt to talk the best part of half a friggin' century ago.
Not that I had any intentions on calling ESKIMOS anything frickin' else!
Now I am friggin' outraged that MY TAX DOLLARS have been used to tell this limp-wristed plonker to politely bugger off.
Exactly what was the cost to all of us taxpayers for investigating this storm in a teacup anyway?
"Two Wanaka teenagers were taken to Dunstan Hospital on Friday night and treated for alcohol poisoning after going to a school function drunk.
Senior Constable Ian Henderson, of Wanaka, said a 15-year-old male and a female whose age was unknown had been at the Mount Aspiring College "Macstock" music concert in the Lake Wanaka Centre when they became seriously ill about 8pm..."
More MSM hysteria.
The condition is (or was) known as 'Pissed'
The best cure is to be left in the recovery position in a cold, damp and uncomfortable cell with other sufferers in a similar condition. A nice policeman will hose off the vomit and urine at about 0600 and bring a nutritious breakfast of warm lard and Tripe. Then he will repeat the cleansing process.
He will check that the patient(s) hearing is not impaired by addressing them in a loud voice.
A brisk walk home will then warm the body and clear the mind.
On the next working day, a magistrate will relieve the patient of surplus money, preventing a re-occurrence.
Note: This treatment will not ameliorate any perceived suffering, but will have a prophylactic effect and minimize future relapses.
"People who use cannabis before the age of 18 are more likely to end up with fewer academic qualifications, a study of more than 6000 New Zealanders and Australians shows.
The research, based on the findings of three studies, including Otago University's long-running Christchurch Health and Development Study, found those who used cannabis before they were 18 were more likely to drop out of high school, less likely to enter university and less likely to get a university degree.
People who used cannabis before the age of 15 were most likely not to achieve academically..."
Confirming what I have said for years.
"One of the six men involved in the aggravated robbery of murdered South Auckland liquor store owner Navtej Singh committed further crimes while out on bail awaiting trial.
Tino Felise was acquitted of murdering Mr Singh but convicted of aggravated robbery and was jailed for five years earlier this month.
While on bail awaiting trial for the murder, Felise obtained a firearm, stole a car and led police on high-speed chase through South Auckland, Radio New Zealand reported today..."
How many times does this have to happen?
How many innocent victims do there have to be?
How much damage to society needs to be done by persons representing a clear and present danger to all are left at large to carry on their criminal lifestyle?
Ten bucks to a knob of goatshit that this prick had a record as long as your arm...
Every day, ten men went to a restaurant for dinner. They always ordered the same meals, and the bill for their food always came to exactly $100.00. They did this day after day, year after year, without variation.
They did not divide the cost of the bill up equally among them, however. Since some of the men were more wealthy than others, they all agreed that an equal split would be unfair to those with less money. So, the men decided to pay the bill in precisely the same way we all pay our income taxes.
The first four men paid nothing at all. They ate for free. The fifth man paid $1.00; the sixth paid $3.00; the seventh paid $7.00; the eighth paid $12.00; the ninth paid $18.00. And the tenth man, who was by far the richest of them, paid exactly $59.00, which was most of the $100.00 bill. He didn't mind, however, since he could afford to pay that amount. All was well. The ten men were happy with this arrangement, and they continued to eat at the restaurant every single day, enjoying their time together.
Then one day... the owner of the restaurant threw them a curve. As they stood at the counter to pay their bill, he announced that he would reduce the cost of the meals for them. "Since you are all such great customers, and I am so appreciative of your business," he said, "I am going to reduce the total bill for your meals by $20.00. From now on, your ten dinners will cost you only $80.00."
The men were pleased. But the situation did present a problem. How were they to divvy up the savings among them? Obviously, they could not simply credit $2.00 (one-tenth of the $20.00 savings) to each of the ten men, since that would mean that the first four men would actually be getting paid $2.00 to eat! No good. It only seemed fair that the first four men, who paid nothing to begin with, should likewise not get any of this $20.00 refund. But still, there was a problem. If they now divided the $20.00 savings among the remaining six men, that would be $3.33 per man. If that amount were subtracted from each man's payment, then the fifth man and sixth man, who had been paying $1.00 and $3.00 respectively, would then be getting paid to eat. That wouldn't work, either. No, the solution to this problem required some ingenuity.
Just then, the restaurant owner, who had been listening to the discussion, interrupted. He offered a solution. He suggested that the fairest way to settle this dilemma would be to reduce each man's bill by the same proportion as he had been paying in the first place. The owner walked over to his calculator and figured out the amounts each man should pay. And so it was agreed.
The fifth man, instead of paying $1.00, now paid nothing, just like the first four men had always done. The sixth man paid $2.00 (reduced from $3.00); the seventh paid $5.00 (reduced from $7.00); the eighth paid $9.00 (reduced from $12.00); the ninth paid $12.00 (reduced from $18.00). This left the tenth man with a bill of $52.00, instead of his previous bill of $59.00. The men paid their bill according to this arrangement, and they left the restaurant, satisfied.
Outside the restaurant, however, the men began to compare their savings. The sixth man started complaining. "I only got one dollar out of the $20.00 savings. That's not much," he said. He pointed to the tenth man and declared, "And he got $7.00. What gives? That's not fair. He's rich. He doesn't need the money. Why did he get $7.00, when I only got $1.00?"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that the rich guy got seven times more than I did! I surely have a much greater need for money the he does."
"That's true," shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get back $7.00, when I got back only $2.00? That stinks! The wealthy get all the breaks. The rich just get richer."
"Wait a minute!" yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. Not one stinking cent! The rich fellow, who drives here every day in a Lexus, got $7.00, and we all take public transit to this restaurant, and we got nothing at all. This system exploits the poor." With that, the men became angry. "And I lost everything," said one of the four. "My wife left me, my daughter is in the hospital, and I can't get work. I could sure use a break. Instead, I got not one lousy penny of the $20.00, and I have to watch this guy who's filthy rich take $7.00 of it! I won't stand for it!"
The nine men surrounded the tenth. Their anger mounted as they continued to express their resentment at what they thought was a supreme injustice. Finally, they lost control of their senses. They beat up the tenth man. They left him bloody in the street, and they went home.
The next day, the tenth man did not show up for their regular dinner. The nine men sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something: they were $52.00 short! Needless to say, that was the last time those men ever ate at that restaurant.
I wish I could say that these nine men learned a valuable lesson, that they came to understand the principle upon which a tax cut is based. But they didn't. They were too stupid to understand.
Of course, if everyone paid their way right from word go...
"The young man accused of punching a Spring Hill prison guard who later died has appeared in Hamilton District Court.
The 21-year-old Auckland man was granted interim name suppression when he appeared in court this afternoon on one charge of common assault..."
He is a CONVICTED CRIMINAL.
How the hell does this POS get name suppression. His parents ALREADY know he is a worthless crap-head.
This is just wrong...
"Parisian authorities are trying to stop a mass cocktail party organised over the Internet and planned for the Eiffel Tower grounds, after a reveller died on Thursday at a gathering of 10,000 people in western France.
The death was the first on record as a result of "Facebook aperitifs" - giant outdoor drinking parties whose popularity has exploded across France in the last six months and which are organised over the online social network...
..The parties often turn into mass drinking binges, and police said the man who died on Thursday in the western city of Nantes had been drunk when he plunged head first over a parapet.
Paris Mayor Bertrand Delanoe said the parties risked spiralling out of control and were aimed at enticing a maximum number of people to drink alcohol in public places..."
So it's not JUST here, but in civilized, cultured Europe too.
"...The two men – part of a self-sanctioned community night patrol – had confronted the group about 10.30pm and verbal abuse was exchanged before the encounter turned violent.
Despite the pair being branded vigilantes, Judge Paul Barber said in Masterton District Court yesterday that they were victims in their own right and he discharged them without conviction.
Judge Barber also said he understood how a community would want to protect itself amid perceptions that police were under-resourced to deal with burglaries..."
The judge got it right- something I don't say all that often!
Bloody good show- but no doubt they are thousands of dollars poorer and the young thugs have gone unpunished.
The police freely admit that they cannot be everywhere and also charge us to 'be responsible for our communities'
Then they must let the communities take back their towns from these thugs and if a few punk heads get smashed along the way- so be it!
While I'm on the topic- we also need tools more suitable for use in an urban setting- pepper spray and tasers. CCW should also be on the list!
"Work and Income has been asked to explain claims that it told a woman to "dumb down" her CV to boost her chances of landing a job.
Napier woman Natalie Meehan said she was told to delete reference to her political science degree and apply for jobs at Pak'n Save supermarket and fast-food outlet KFC.
Work and Income has confirmed its staff suggested she remove reference to the degree.
The advice has "mortified" Ms Meehan, who says Work and Income staff feared potential employers would be intimidated by her CV. "I am really proud of my achievements and I don't want to delete them. I'm just a kid wanting to start my career and that wasn't the kind of advice I was expecting. I was told to make my CV look like I had no skills..."
WINZ were 100% right.
She was after a scut job, while waiting for another job.
The gave her the right advice for that.
Most employers would see a person with a degree in political sciences as somebody who would 'fit in' with the other underlings. An employer worth a damn tries to recruit perople who will be able to relate to and get along with those they will be working alongside. It's hard enough keeping the workplace wheels lubricated without throwing sand in the grease-gun.
Then there is the potential for overqualified types to become bush lawyers.
This chap has it right:
"Recruitment expert Tom O'Neil said sometimes people had to "bite the bullet" and make their CVs look basic, especially if they wanted only short-term work. "An employer might look at a CV and think, `This is a Ferrari' and they only want a Lada. There is also the risk the employer might feel like the potential employee is a threat to their own job. It's silly, but it happens..."
The last sentence is very true, nowhere more so that the public AKA taxpayer-funded sector.
Paula Bennett hasn't got a friggin' clue.
"Prime Minister John Key's decision to quit an overseas trade mission to attend the funerals of three Air Force servicemen has been criticised as "short-sighted and irresponsible".
The comments were made by Cognition Education chief executive John Langley, who was one of 90 business men and women in the delegation to Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Kuwait and the United Arab Emirates..."
Message to John Langley:
I want to stick my index finger through the ear thing, flick the metalwork on the snout off with my thumb, fling the fucker and see if he explodes.
Of course if he doesn’t, the drill is to put a couple of blocks of C4 around him and make sure he does go bang!