Saturday, December 26, 2009

Suppression orders

Friggin' judges need to have a think about who they actually work for!

This is why people like Cameron Slater are sticking their necks out.

"An 86-year-old victim of a vicious street mugging is disgusted her alleged attacker has received name suppression out of consideration for his 90-year-old grandmother..."


Cameron may be in contempt of court.

The courts are showing nothing but contempt towards the good people of New Zealand.

4 comments:

Lucy said...

Yep!

Doug said...

New Zealand legal system has forgotten who they are supposed to protect.

Anonymous said...

Didn't Cameron Slater put stuff on his blog that can identify a victim of crime who wishes to keep their identity a secret?

Is that sort of behaviour okay?

sweetpea said...

Too many are getting name suppression.
What deterant is there to commiting a crime if every man and his dog can't find out what you did even when you were caught?